Survey Reveals That Texans Are More Likely To Post A Negative Review

Unsolicited organic reviews are willingly written by customers based on their personal experience with a brand. For example, king kong marketing reviews are posted by clients of a digital agency after a great and satisfactory service.

According to the results of a survey made by Real Business Savings, Texans won’t hesitate to share their unfavourable experience with a business. They are more likely to leave a negative review than other Americans.

The national average of negative reviews for a poor product or sub-par service is 31% vs. 36% in Texas. Meanwhile, 42% of Floridians are more likely to leave a negative review while only 15% of Delaware residents will do the same.

However, businesses believe that their competitors may be posting fake reviews to make them look bad. To handle negative reviews, businesses respond promptly to reviews posted in Yelp or Trip Advisor. When businesses react to comments, it makes a big difference in continuing positive public relations.

Business owners in Texas are prepared to fight to defend their reputation. 22% are willing to sue for defamation if the negative review is inaccurate and damages the business. Meanwhile, 93% do not want to engage in an online battle over a negative review. They prefer to investigate the situation that caused the complaint and rectify the situation, if possible.

When businesses interact with customers online, they enhance online presence. Since consumers are reliant on reviews like king kong marketing reviews, it is only fair to ensure that the comments are fair and will be beneficial to other consumers.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

COVID Economy Changing How Aussies Do Online Shopping

Toluna’s COVID-19 Barometer was recently published, and it showed information that people invested in online retail, advertisements, and king kong marketing reviews would like to hear.

The report notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has tilted the market more towards online shopping, with online shopping and digital streaming seeing boosts across the AU. However, physical stores still have a niche, as the data shows that Aussies prefer getting key personal items from brick and mortar shops by themselves.

46% of the respondents in the report noted they want to get personal care and toiletries from physical stores, 57% preferred in-store grocery shopping, 39% preferred getting their clothes themselves, and 32% stated that they prefer to acquire tech items in-store.

In contrast, only 11% of respondents stated that they prefer getting toiletries and personal care items online, while only 15% of the respondents stated that they prefer getting tech items by purchasing these items online.

Toluna A/NZ Business Director Stephen Walker states that Aussies have been forced to change how they handle financials and shop thanks to COVID, which is why data is more important now than ever. They noted that while the increase in online shopping is good for people invested in king kong marketing reviews and the like, it’s good that retailers and physical stores still have their place.

A/NZ stated that it’s encouraging that people are going for in-store shopping when it’s safe, even as they expect the changes in customer habits caused by COVID-19 to stick around even when the pandemic is finally put to rest for good.

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Australia’s A Different Place For Brands, Report Says

COVID-19 has hit the global economy and community hard, with industries, organizations, and individuals being forced to adapt. With things like marketing strategies, king kong marketing reviews and the like being noticeably different from what they were before the pandemic.

A report entitled Brand New Australia, from The Lab and Nature took a look at how Aussies’ outlooks have changed in the wake of COVID-19, with their data showing that around two-thirds of Aussies see the pandemic, the restrictions and changes that it brought to people’s lives, were the clean slate that was needed for a re-evaluation of people’s lifestyles. Meanwhile, about one-third stated that they feel that COVID-19 has changed what they really want out of life.

Nature Sydney Managing Director James Jayesuria says that the research is a clear sign that a lot of Aussies see COVID-19 as a chance for change, contrasting a fair number of people who believes that things need to go back to ‘normal’.

Jayesuria says that more than half of their respondents expressed fears about their futures, while more than a third saw opportunities arising from the crisis.

The Brand New Australia report is based on qualitative and quantitative national research of Aussies, with a sample size of 6,000 people aged 18 and over.

For those interested in king kong marketing reviews and the like, the report also noted that five new consumer groups have emerged from the COVID-19 world, which they labelled as such:

  • Safety seekers, representing 26% of Aussies, are the people that worry about their future, and harbour fears that they or someone they’re close with will get COVID-19.
  • Strugglers, accounting for 18%, are similar, but their concerns are more about financials.
  • Simplifiers, who account for 20%, want to live simpler lives and had their outlook on life changed.
  • Opportunists, also accounting for 20%, are people who see the COVID-19 pandemic as a chance to re-evaluate how they live their lives.
  • Returners, who account for 16% of respondents, are the ones that are least worried about the future and simply want things to return to the way they were.

Lab Co-Founder and CEO Neale Cotton says that COVID-19 has changed a lot of people’s loves, but how people react and how they now see the future isn’t uniform. They note that, in this time and climate, it’s more important than ever for brands to communicate.

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

The Inequalities Of Online Job Hunting

The internet has allowed job seekers to access a wide range of job opportunities while organizations are allowed access to a much larger talent pool. Besides the job listings, job seekers can access valuable information from reviews like King Kong agency reviews from the employees’ direct personal experiences with the digital agency.

According to research studies, the internet has certainly affected the process of recruitment in the real world; however, access to information is not enjoyed by all people. Both public and private sectors use online tools to advertise job openings with the objective of recruiting quality talent. This has resulted into a profound division between low-skill and low-salary jobs and high-skill and high-salary jobs.

Researchers explain that lower-wage jobs are advertised in large job sites to provide the jobs with good visibility. This results into hundreds of thousands of applicants for different vacant positions. This system makes it more difficult for individual job seekers to find employment. HR professionals have to face the challenge of sorting through thousands of applications. Because of competition and the workload placed on HR, it is extremely unlikely for a job seeker to receive a feedback.

The situation is different for more influential and senior positions that require specific skills. There is a much smaller pool of potential candidates and recruiters describe it as finding purple squirrels. While these positions are also posted on big job sites, there is bias against those who actually apply for the jobs.

It is common for HR professionals to use LinkedIn to find and recruit purple squirrels that are presently employed and are not on the lookout for new careers. This system of hiring has resulted into a very shallow pool of potential candidates that can be considered. Those who are currently holding senior positions are more likely to be approached for vacant senior positions.

There are many job opportunities nowadays for job seekers. However, it should not prevent them from considering the potential employer and whether their needs can be provided well. One of the ways to make a confident employment decision is to read King Kong agency reviews where the digital agency’s employees share their opinions about their employer.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Fake Online Reviews Are A Problem For Australia

Aussies like to browse the internet. They also like to look at online reviews to see which companies and brands they can trust. However, the ACCC has warned that, unlike all those King Kong agency reviews, not all reviews on the internet might be reliable.

According to Australia’s competition watchdog, there have been a lot of complaints fake negative online reviews. One particular case that the Council of Small Business dealing with a union that was trying to hurt a business.

CEO Peter Strong says that these things do happen, that people do target businesses over ideology or personality, regardless of how good that business actually is, and that’s what’s got them concerned.

Fake online reviews can be extremely problematic for the businesses that have to deal with them. One such unlucky business owner was Michael Napoli, who runs a hairdressing salon. He says that online reviews can be hard, as people put a lot of stock in King Kong agency reviews and the like; no online reviews means people just ignore you.

The problem, Napoli notes, is that you don’t know if the customer’s actually been to the business, or if it’s just a competitor looking for an underhanded advantage. And, he notes, getting rid of them is impossible.

Complaints can be filed to the ACCC, who can investigate and issue penalties of up to greater than $1mn, but that’s all they’re capable of, as it stands. Negative reviews can’t be removed by the ACCC or the government, regardless of how much damage they’re doing to undeserving businesses and their owners.

The Council of Small Business Organisations of Australia (COSBOA), is working with the ACCC to give businesses more tools to deal with fake online reviews.

A report published on the ACCC Digital Platforms Inquiry stated recommendations from the organization saying that an ombudsman should be able to investigate fake reviews, take down content whenever deemed appropriate, and be able to mandate compensation.

The Prime Minister asked AU Minister for Communications Paul Fletcher how the Government would respond to the recommendations, and stated that they’ll be looking at them, with a formal response set to come before the end of 2019.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail